Ex-Three.

Don’t worry, Eric. I’ll get to QC in a bit. Something else demands my attention at the moment.

And that something is X-Men 3.

The new trailer is out, and I’m really really pondering over it. I’m taking all the input I can from really only out of context visual stimuli. And as I’m watching, I’m hearing the echoes of many heated nerd conversations between my X-Fan peers. We’re really weary about this new installment. Mostly because Bryan Singer is not at the helm. Neither is David Hayter (who, in addition to having written the first two X-Men flicks, is Solid Fucking Snake). So who do we have?

We’ve got Brett Ratner. Yeah. Rush Hour Brett Ratner. Don’t get me wrong, I enjoyed Rush Hour 1 & 2. They were very entertaining. But they’re not X-Men.

Whatever, I’m just not comfortable with anyone who’s not Bryan Singer doing X-Men.

Watching the trailer, I’m seeing a lot is being borrowed from the Ultimate X-Men series, as well as bits and pieces from Grant Morrison’s run (it seems). However, if you’re an X-Fan and you are interested in peeing your pants, check out the Extended Cast List. There’s a lot of goddamned mutants right there. We can probably expect an all out mutant war between Xavier’s School and Magneto’s Brotherhood. And that has definite autourinational potential.

Oh, and Kelsey Grammar as Beast. And he looks great. And Vinnie Jones as Juggernaut? Not at all a bad choice.

The casting is turning out to be stellar so far. With the exception, of course, of Halle Berry as Storm. But then again, she got involved in X-Men before she won the Oscar and became a tremendously self-important bitch (or so I irrationally believe).

Anyway, I’m excited, and cautiously optimistic. If I were able, I would be very inclined to cryogenically freeze myself until the release of X-Men 3. Because the suspense is slowly murdering me.

8 Responses to “Ex-Three.”

  1. Jami Says:

    Dude, FASTBALL FUCKING SPECIAL! SOLD!

  2. Phil Kahn Says:

    Yeah, dude! You I totally saw that!

    I also saw how many times they depicted Wolverine smoking a stogey with an explosion behind him.

  3. Jami Says:

    Logan is a closet piro.

  4. lucastds Says:

    I haven’t had time to look at it. I’m still waiting for Chronicles of Narnia. Oh yeah!

  5. Phil Kahn Says:

    Jami: Or maybe Logan is “in the closet” for Pyro? I’m sure fanslash for that exists somewhere out there in shameless Yaoi land.

    Lucas: Check out this editorial on Narnia.

  6. lucastds Says:

    I agree with most of the things said in that editorial — however I do not share the author’s skepticism towards Andrew Adamson. Shrek can be read on more levels than just a silly children’s story, and in a way, it did a lot of what Narnia is doing (mixing together different mythologies for the purpose of storytelling).

    I do wish Disney would just take the risk. I wasn’t aware that Caspian hadn’t been greenlighted. I first read that 5 films were being made.

  7. Blue Says:

    I’m remaining cautiously optomistic. I’m all for Logan with the cigar, but GOD, didn’t it show up like what, five gajillion times in the trailer? Mannnnnnnn. ::shakes head::

    What I don’t like is how they show Jean alloverthefuckwhere. Like, I mean, we knew she was gonna come back. All us fan-peoples know the Phoenix saga n’ shit. BUT. Did they have to go right out and SHOW it?? I think just seeing Logan look at Cyclops’ shades bein’ all floaty-floaty in the air like “OMGWTF?!” would be enough to have everyone going “OOO!” Not showing Jean go TEH CRAZY all over the place. Less is more, people, less is more.

    And now I go off and be nerdy some more. BWEEE!

  8. Phil Kahn Says:

    Yeah, they should’ve kept Jean a secret. We also know that Cyclops is totally gonna bite it as well.

Leave a Reply