I gave it a shot: Kevin and Kell


(From Kevin and Kell, by Bill Holbrook)

I definitely gave this strip a shot. It looked good, it was funny enough to invest a bit of interest in it, and a lot of other webcomic folks like it. So I thought, Hey. I’ll give it a shot.

And I’m sorry to say I don’t like it. I think I wanted to, but I didn’t. And I’m trying to wrap my brain around why that is, and frankly it’s mostly a matter of taste. But I can’t just go around going “Meh. I didn’t like it. Why? I uh, I just… don’t.”

One of the major things is that I can’t grasp the society they live in. It’s a world of furry, or anthropomorphic animals, whatever you wanna call it. In this world, the system of predator and prey is still in action, but regulated. And I can’t tell why some animals are fully erect with opposable thumbs and the like and some aren’t. Are they all sentient or not? And they EAT each other! And everyone’s OK with that. As I understand, there’s a regulation agency, Herd Thinners, Inc. which determines who gets eaten, or who gets to eat or something. And these creatures have to live with the fact that at any given day, they can be eaten. Killed, mauled, torn to shreds. That terrifies me, personally.

And then there was the Easter Bunny arc, which was my first bout of trying to understand the sociological workings in Kevin and Kell. Here, on Easter, Kevin is the Easter Bunny for his district. He hides the eggs all over the place. Hold on, EGGS? Those are the unfertilized children of other animals! Living people who you might know! Not to mention the fact that we’re not certain that there was a furry Jesus in order to give rise to the ceremony of Easter in the first place.

I took a stroll through the archives. Basically started at the beginning and read for a while. And honestly? The early stuff is good. Except it only causes to rise more questions in my mind. Like, when they had their baby, it came out a rabbit. But psychologically a predator. Which is funny enough, but I would never think that a wolf and a rabbit COULD mate. Being that they’re both an entirely different race from the other, it doesn’t seem possible.

I know I’m raising a lot of complaints here. This is why I don’t really dig the strip. It raises far too many questions in my mind. Not the good kind of questions, the intrigue and curiosity. But the bad kind of questions, the confusion variety. The art’s good, it’s generally funny from day to day, and a lot of people like, love, and understand what goes on in this strip. I just don’t get it, I guess.

But hey, I gave it a shot.

8 Responses to “I gave it a shot: Kevin and Kell”

  1. Peter C. Hayward Says:

    Pfft. I’m guessing you’re not a fan of Homestarrunner? It raises just as many questions about the weird things that go on.

    http://www.homestarrunner.com

  2. Phil Kahn Says:

    Now see, that’s an entirely different matter in my mind. Homestar Runner deals with just plain absurdity, and in that context, things don’t need to be explained. Kevin and Kell is a situation comedy. And when the situation is questionable, I get confused.

    For the record, I fucking love Homestar Runner. I even have a LIMO/ZEEN t-shirt and the CD.

  3. KevDude Says:

    That you don’t have the DVD automatically marks your HSR fan level down 10 notches.

  4. Phil Kahn Says:

    Oh, not neccessarily. Buying the DVD will come in due time, as soon as I can afford it.

  5. Nick Says:

    “One of the major things is that I can’t grasp the society they live in.”
    I’m tempted to make a joke about how non-domesticated characters in the aforementioned comic flee from things they don’t understand and how you must not be domesticated since you don’t like the comic, but then I realized it would’ve been the worst joke ever.

  6. Phil Kahn Says:

    Thanks for the thought anyhow, Nick. That would’ve been really not funny. :D

  7. Nick Says:

    Oh, by the way, there was a furry Jesus.

  8. Phil Kahn Says:

    You’re not helping.

Leave a Reply